Page 6 of 10

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 5:27 am
by yeders
hi MooMoofx,

Thank you for that explanation. So it gives you more customization, which may improve the strategy, or make it worse depending on the parameters ;)

Cheers,
Yeders

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:24 pm
by Vantages
Hello MooMooFx,

Thank you for your version of HA RSI strategy. The latest gives a smooth performance.

Here are some of my inquiries and suggestions:

-Will the strategy together with BREAKEVENALL or with any other strategy in one account/login works simultaneously with any multiple forex pairs, indices,commodities and CFD'S as long as multiple MAGICNUMBERS are in place?
-Will the strategy needs to RESTART or PAUSE-RESTART with every new trades or positions,every day-week-month?
-Works with any time frame with upto 10000 in PERIODS?
-Will the strategy interprets the exits or close position per level/line crosses or closes all regardless where level or crosses it was entered?
-Will MA Filter works with contrarian approach?(I believed it is not)But,what is TYPE of SIGNAL for?
-Entry Orders Only with GAP & Trailings works like the idea of price retracements before entering?

-What or how is "valid interval for operation in second" works? Is it the DELAYS of line crosses interpretation or the DELAYS of entering the new position after the line crosses?
>Is it possible to replace or add the seconds with minutes and hours ? This will minimise the multiples.

Thank you very much for your excellent works! Have a nice and safe day!

Vantages

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 6:31 pm
by Vantages
Hi MooMooFx,

I recently looked into your HA Pivot, would it be possible to add "Position Throttle" in HA RSI ?
How about another "Period(2)" that will also interpret the same parameters as "Period(1) ?
Doing this would be ultimate with the strategy.

Thank you very much for your time! Hoping for your thoughts on it. :?:

Vantages

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:59 am
by Apprentice
Your request is added to the development list.

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 10:19 am
by Daydreaminblue
Apprentice,

Would you be able to add "Tick" as part of the price source options so that it doesn't have to wait to take action by other means?

Thanks in advance.

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:50 am
by palnico
Hi Moomoofx,

Sorry for my bad english.

I'm using your .lua Highly Adaptable Rsi, really a great job.
I use the 2 Period Rsi strategy and I've a question: is possible
to place an order just in the momet that the rsi is over or under the target level?
In the version I use it waits the candle's closing time (4h) and for my strategy, usually it's to late...

Thanks for your attention

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 9:40 pm
by stampede1a
Hi... I'm new in this forum... Nice to meet you...
I have a question about the parameters of this strategy...
You'll see I wanna the strategy place trades in both directions (sell and buy) but I want the trade only will be closed if hit stop or limit order... However if I enable "allow both sides" the strategy closes the trade when the opposite signal is triggered and opens a new trade...
Did you understand?...
Sorry for my bad english... I did my best :D

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 4:03 am
by Apprentice
I understand.
We have several versions in this topic.
Can you provide link to underlying version.

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 10:20 am
by stampede1a
Apprentice wrote:I understand.
We have several versions in this topic.
Can you provide link to underlying version.


Ummm... Don't know what version is... I just downloaded .lua file from first post of the topic just yesterday...

Re: Highly adaptable RSI Strategy

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:10 am
by Apprentice
Please Re-Download.
I introduced the Close On Opposite parameter.
In your case U will use No.